| | Replies: | | | |
|
3qn
|
Reply to: Burger King to go??
|
I live directly opposite. The crossways hotel is a fantastic building, I dont see why we need some wooden framed, glass fronted box to replace is this a sign of the new eltham to come. I would like greenwich to have a consultation meeting with the residents and notify us all of it. Im sure there are many with a few things to say about this money making mission.
|
06/04/2010 18:55
|
|
|
kiriharris
|
Reply to: Burger King to go??
|
To any residents of New Eltham, especially those near the crossways. There are plans to build an 80 bed hotel on the site of the former crossways pub which is currently a burger king. The plans are totally ill fitting with the area and the hotel would be a complete eyesore! They plan to have 80 rooms yet only 40 car parking spaces which would cause havoc in new eltham, let alone the disruption that would be caused whilst the building work went ahead. The building of this hotel would not boost the community as it stands. Greenwich council have allegedly sent letters to local residents, many of which have not been received. If you feel that the hotel planning permission should not go ahead, please contact Greenwich council's planning department. You can email your objections to jacob.jaarsma@greenwich.go.uk
|
23/03/2010 09:28
|
|
|
johnboy
|
Reply to: Burger King to go??
|
is it too late for the building to be listed?it is of real interest,and a good focal point.
|
11/03/2010 15:00
|
|
|
citizen
|
Reply to: Burger King to go??
|
Yes, the original building in many other contexts would have been listed. It is of significant architectural merit, and does much at this junction to anchor the scale of people and local housing. A hotel would be fine, but it must be sympathetic to, and seek to imporove, the local area. even the much neglected flats across the road are of interest in architectural terms. If we are not careful, Fiveways will become the spaghetti junction of South East London. We must do something about this!
|
09/03/2010 08:02
|
| | Go to page: | | | |
| 1 |